nanog mailing list archives
Re: MPLS and Carrier Ethernet, Oh My!
From: Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa>
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2024 06:08:53 +0200
On 12/28/24 00:31, Mike Hammett wrote:
*nods* for PtP, I agree. As a buyer (and a seller) waves, waves, waves. As a seller, it's less stuff for me to manage. As a buyer, I don't have to trust you on oversubscribing a wave because you can't. You can oversubscribe the hell out of an Ethernet circuit, though.Waves are much harder in a PtMP environment, especially with cross connect costs.
That is a problem OpenXR has been designed to fix: https://openxropticsforum.org Infinera have already started shipping product: https://www.infinera.com/innovation/xr-optics/ Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: MPLS and Carrier Ethernet, Oh My!, (continued)
- Re: MPLS and Carrier Ethernet, Oh My! Aaron1 (Dec 26)
- Re: MPLS and Carrier Ethernet, Oh My! Edwin Mallette (Dec 26)
- Re: MPLS and Carrier Ethernet, Oh My! Mark Tinka (Dec 26)
- Re: MPLS and Carrier Ethernet, Oh My! Edwin Mallette (Dec 26)
- Re: MPLS and Carrier Ethernet, Oh My! Mark Tinka (Dec 26)
- Re: MPLS and Carrier Ethernet, Oh My! Mike Hammett (Dec 26)
- Re: MPLS and Carrier Ethernet, Oh My! Mark Tinka (Dec 26)
- RE: MPLS and Carrier Ethernet, Oh My! Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Dec 26)
- Re: MPLS and Carrier Ethernet, Oh My! Tom Beecher (Dec 27)
- Re: MPLS and Carrier Ethernet, Oh My! Mark Tinka (Dec 27)
- Re: MPLS and Carrier Ethernet, Oh My! Mike Hammett (Dec 27)
- Re: MPLS and Carrier Ethernet, Oh My! Mark Tinka (Dec 27)
- Re: MPLS and Carrier Ethernet, Oh My! Aaron1 (Dec 26)
