nanog mailing list archives

RE: Route optimization using GPUs?


From: Drew Weaver <drew.weaver () thenap com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 14:07:57 +0000

The ones I've used have simply injected more specific routes into my own local routing table to determine what path 
traffic takes to reach a specific destination.

That's pretty much all it does.

The same way I use communities to do this based upon geography, or 500 other things [avoiding 1299 getting to certain 
networks]. The difference is now it's all manual.

I wasn't advocating for allowing route optimizers to inject routes that escape your own ASN.

I'm not sure how that became the topic.

Thanks,
-Drew


-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+drew.weaver=thenap.com () nanog org> On Behalf Of Niels Bakker
Sent: Friday, December 6, 2024 1:03 PM
To: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: Route optimization using GPUs?

* ryan () rkhtech org (Ryan Hamel) [Fri 06 Dec 2024, 18:46 CET]:
William,

Exactly! An example below is where operators/orgs do not have the funds 
for a full table router deployment and gather top talkers from sFlow, 
which says what routes are to be installed in TCAM, instead of hitting 
a default route.

You realise that this is not just what the problematic "route optimizers" do, right? And also not the problematic bit?


        -- Niels.


Current thread: