nanog mailing list archives
RE: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block
From: KARIM MEKKAOUI <amekkaoui () mektel ca>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 14:47:03 +0000
Interesting and thank you for sharing.
KARIM
From: Abraham Y. Chen <aychen () avinta com>
Sent: January 10, 2024 7:35 AM
To: KARIM MEKKAOUI <amekkaoui () mektel ca>
Cc: nanog () nanog org; Chen, Abraham Y. <AYChen () alum MIT edu>
Subject: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block
Importance: High
Hi, Karim:
1) If you have control of your own equipment (I presume that your business includes IAP - Internet Access Provider,
since you are asking to buy IPv4 blocks.), you can get a large block of reserved IPv4 address for free by disabling the
program codes in your current facility that has been disabling the use of 240/4 netblock. Please have a look at the
below whitepaper. Utilized according to the outlined disciplines, this is a practically unlimited resources. It has
been known that multi-national conglomerates have been using it without announcement. So, you can do so stealthily
according to the proposed mechanism which establishes uniform practices, just as well.
https://www.avinta.com/phoenix-1/home/RevampTheInternet.pdf
2) Being an unorthodox solution, if not controversial, please follow up with me offline. Unless, other NANOGers
express their interests.
Regards,
Abe (2024-01-10 07:34 EST)
On 2024-01-07 22:46, KARIM MEKKAOUI wrote:
Hi Nanog Community
Any idea please on the best way to buy IPv4 blocs and what is the price?
Thank you
KARIM
[https://s-install.avcdn.net/ipm/preview/icons/icon-envelope-tick-round-orange-animated-no-repeat-v1.gif]<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
Virus-free.www.avast.com<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
Current thread:
- RE: One Can't Have It Both Ways Re: Streamline the CG-NAT Re: EzIP Re: IPv4 address block, (continued)
- RE: One Can't Have It Both Ways Re: Streamline the CG-NAT Re: EzIP Re: IPv4 address block Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Jan 14)
- Re: One Can't Have It Both Ways Re: Streamline the CG-NAT Re: EzIP Re: IPv4 address block Brian Knight via NANOG (Jan 15)
- Re: One Can't Have It Both Ways Re: Streamline the CG-NAT Re: EzIP Re: IPv4 address block Abraham Y. Chen (Jan 15)
- Re: One Can't Have It Both Ways Re: Streamline the CG-NAT Re: EzIP Re: IPv4 address block sronan (Jan 15)
- Re: One Can't Have It Both Ways Re: Streamline the CG-NAT Re: EzIP Re: IPv4 address block Abraham Y. Chen (Jan 15)
- Re: One Can't Have It Both Ways Re: Streamline the CG-NAT Re: EzIP Re: IPv4 address block sronan (Jan 15)
- Re: One Can't Have It Both Ways Re: Streamline the CG-NAT Re: EzIP Re: IPv4 address block Christopher Hawker (Jan 15)
- Re: One Can't Have It Both Ways Re: Streamline the CG-NAT Re: EzIP Re: IPv4 address block Brandon Jackson (Jan 15)
- Re: One Can't Have It Both Ways Re: Streamline the CG-NAT Re: EzIP Re: IPv4 address block Christopher Hawker (Jan 15)
- Re: One Can't Have It Both Ways Re: Streamline the CG-NAT Re: EzIP Re: IPv4 address block Forrest Christian (List Account) (Jan 15)
- Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Tom Beecher (Jan 10)
- Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Nick Hilliard (Jan 10)
- Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Michael Butler via NANOG (Jan 10)
- Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Tom Beecher (Jan 10)
- Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Dave Taht (Jan 11)
- Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Nick Hilliard (Jan 11)
- Streamline The CG-NAT Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block Abraham Y. Chen (Jan 11)
