nanog mailing list archives
Re: 600,000 routers bricked
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 14:03:50 -0400
On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 1:40 PM Matt Erculiani <merculiani () gmail com> wrote:
It's important to note though that if you quietly (or even publicly) patch 600k devices to fix a bug, nobody cares. Plus, doing so is still a crime: it's 600k instances of accessing a computer system without permission. It's also far, FAR easier to write a stream of 0s to the bootloader than it is to decompile and debug bad firmware.
Lumen USED TO HAVE a walled-garden they dropped people into when their links/network ran amok.. at least in legacy-qwest/century-link consumer connectivity situations. maybe that's gone now? maybe the part of the affected network for this incident didn't have that capability?
Current thread:
- 600,000 routers bricked Dave Taht (Jun 02)
- Re: 600,000 routers bricked Josh Luthman (Jun 02)
- Re: 600,000 routers bricked Dave Taht (Jun 02)
- Re: 600,000 routers bricked Alan Buxey (Jun 03)
- Re: 600,000 routers bricked Tom Beecher (Jun 02)
- RE: 600,000 routers bricked Howard, Lee via NANOG (Jun 03)
- Re: 600,000 routers bricked Tom Beecher (Jun 03)
- RE: 600,000 routers bricked Howard, Lee via NANOG (Jun 03)
- Re: 600,000 routers bricked Matthew Petach (Jun 03)
- Re: 600,000 routers bricked Matt Erculiani (Jun 03)
- Re: 600,000 routers bricked Christopher Morrow (Jun 03)
- RE: 600,000 routers bricked Robert Jacobs (Jun 03)
- Re: 600,000 routers bricked John Levine (Jun 04)
- Re: 600,000 routers bricked Matt Erculiani (Jun 03)
- Re: 600,000 routers bricked Josh Luthman (Jun 02)
