Re: Cogent BGP session more than 1 router ipv6

[Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa>]

On 6/12/24 05:51, Mike Hammett wrote:

> That doesn't even make any sense. IPv4 is a contended resource, but 
> IPv6 is not. They're already double-dipping by charging for the extra 
> BGP sessions.

Perhaps, is the issue that what customers are paying for is the ability 
to have multiple BGP sessions against a wider address scope than 
standard p2p toward the same Cogent edge router, rather than just paying 
for the wider address scope space itself?

In other words; p2p BGPv6 session = free; p2mp BGPv6 session = $$.

Mark.