Re: TCP-AO for BGP Peering?

[Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>]

I don't think that URL explains how commonly it is used.

In my experience TCP-AO use is extremely limited, partly because it's
super new in practice. Juniper had it for a long time, but it was
pre-standard even years after the standard was published, which
probably didn't matter much, as no one else had it at all until
somewhat recently.

I suspect this type of order of events may have led many people to
look into TCP-AO early on, and decided correctly it was not
operationally feasible, and that has stuck.



On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 at 13:57, Marco Paesani <marco () paesani it> wrote:
> Hi,
> you can start from here:
> https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/transport-ip/topics/topic-map/tcp-configure-ao-bgp-ldp.html
>
> Regards,
>
>
> -----
>
> Marco Paesani
>
>
>
>
> Skype: mpaesani
> Mobile: +39 348 6019349
> Success depends on the right choice !
> Email: marco () paesani it
>
>
>
>
> Il giorno mer 12 giu 2024 alle ore 12:52 7riw77 () gmail com <7riw77 () gmail com> ha scritto:
> > Y'all --
> >
> > Does anyone know of a survey or study showing the rate of uptake for BGP over TCP-AO? I've poked around some and 
> > asked in a few places and not found anything, but I probably missed something out there.
> >
> > If there's no studies, does anyone have any experiences possibly indicating BGP over TCP-AO usage they can share?
> >
> > :-) /r



-- 
  ++ytti