nanog mailing list archives
Re: XGS-PON/GPON vendor with PoE ONTs
From: Brandon Martin <lists.nanog () monmotha net>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 11:35:04 -0400
On 6/19/24 09:30, Karsten Thomann via NANOG wrote:
As the ONT should all be using OMCI, any reason not using Zhone ONT with another OLT Vendor to avoid the CLI issue? Or are they that special and don't work with other OLT?
I know with GPON, there are some nuances in the OMCI that cause frequent issues with interoperability between ONT and OLT vendors.
I believe many of these were resolved with XGSPON, but you should consult your OLT vendor. At minimum, expect to potentially into a situation where you cannot bulk upgrade the ONT firmware from the OLT over the OMCI but instead have to do it with L3 connectivity to each ONT.
-- Brandon Martin
Current thread:
- XGS-PON/GPON vendor with PoE ONTs chiel via NANOG (Jun 19)
- RE: XGS-PON/GPON vendor with PoE ONTs Travis Garrison (Jun 19)
- Re: XGS-PON/GPON vendor with PoE ONTs Karsten Thomann via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: XGS-PON/GPON vendor with PoE ONTs Brandon Martin (Jun 19)
- Re: XGS-PON/GPON vendor with PoE ONTs Karsten Thomann via NANOG (Jun 19)
- Re: XGS-PON/GPON vendor with PoE ONTs Chris Hills (Jun 21)
- Re: XGS-PON/GPON vendor with PoE ONTs Josh Luthman (Jun 28)
- Re: XGS-PON/GPON vendor with PoE ONTs Jared Mauch (Jun 28)
- Re: XGS-PON/GPON vendor with PoE ONTs Karsten Thomann via NANOG (Jun 19)
- RE: XGS-PON/GPON vendor with PoE ONTs Travis Garrison (Jun 19)
- Re: XGS-PON/GPON vendor with PoE ONTs Brandon Martin (Jun 19)
