Re: Shaping the Future of ICP-2: Community Input Extended to December 2024

[Dilip Kounmany <dlilipk2204 () gmail com>]

Hello NANOG community,

I’d like to share my thoughts on the ongoing discussion regarding the
ICP-2 revision, particularly the importance of the “Portability of
Rights to Number Resources.”

ICP-2 is essential for guiding Regional Internet Registries (RIRs) in
managing IP addresses globally. As we consider revisions, I believe
that ensuring the portability of IP resources should be a hard
requirement. This means networks should have the right to move their
IP resources between RIRs without undue restrictions.

Portability is crucial for maintaining network autonomy, allowing
operators to control their resources independently of any single RIR.
It also promotes competition among RIRs, incentivizing them to improve
service quality and accountability.

Additionally, if an RIR’s performance negatively impacts a network's
operation, there should be a clear mechanism for portability, similar
to DNS registries. This would serve as a necessary safety net for
networks facing operational issues.

As we move forward, let’s advocate for these changes in the ICP-2
policy to foster a more resilient and accountable Internet governance
framework.

I look forward to hearing your thoughts!