nanog mailing list archives
Re: Implementing Decentralized RPKI with Blockchain Technology
From: Jason Iannone <jason.iannone () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 14:36:03 -0500
Imagine decentralizing x.509. On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 11:42 AM Roman Tatarnikov <r.tatarnikov () intlos org> wrote:
Could this approach work? Perhaps there’s existing research on similar methods?Brandon, I blockchain and BGP were discussed on NANOG some years ago, back when the deployment of RPKI was brought up. Short answer - it won't solve jack and will use tons of computation power. I'm not really going to go into details, but essentially adding a band-aid instead of adopting RPKI and addressing the issues with RIR is not the best course of action. -- Roman V Tatarnikov | https://linkedin.com/in/rtatarnikov
Current thread:
- Re: Implementing Decentralized RPKI with Blockchain Technology, (continued)
- Re: Implementing Decentralized RPKI with Blockchain Technology Matt Corallo (Nov 18)
- Re: Implementing Decentralized RPKI with Blockchain Technology Tom Beecher (Nov 14)
- Re: Implementing Decentralized RPKI with Blockchain Technology Matt Corallo (Nov 17)
- Re: Implementing Decentralized RPKI with Blockchain Technology Tom Beecher (Nov 17)
- Re: Implementing Decentralized RPKI with Blockchain Technology Matt Corallo (Nov 18)
- Re: Implementing Decentralized RPKI with Blockchain Technology Niels Bakker (Nov 18)
- Re: Implementing Decentralized RPKI with Blockchain Technology Matt Corallo (Nov 18)
- Re: Implementing Decentralized RPKI with Blockchain Technology Job Snijders via NANOG (Nov 29)
- Re: Implementing Decentralized RPKI with Blockchain Technology Roman Tatarnikov (Nov 13)
- Re: Implementing Decentralized RPKI with Blockchain Technology Jason Iannone (Nov 13)
