Re: Question about the use of NO_EXPORT in BGP route announcements

[Ben Cartwright-Cox via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>]

One example is if the customer is doing ROKI ROV validation (and their
upstream isn't) having a default would defeat ROV validation

On Fri, Sep 20, 2024, 20:40 <sronan () ronan-online com> wrote:

> Why would a single homed customer not take a default route?
>
> > On Sep 20, 2024, at 1:25 PM, Tarko Tikan <tarko () lanparty ee> wrote:
> >
> > hey,
> >
> > > Yeah, no. Provided they are singlehomed customers who generally set (or
> take) a
> > > default route to that transit, they are completely fine. Their transit
> knows
> > > the prefix and will use it. It gets more problematic for multihomed
> customers.
> > Well I have no idea why do you say that all such customers always have
> default route pointed to their transit provider. If that is the case then
> everything is OK ofc but you can't really take that for granted.
> > --
> > tarko