nanog mailing list archives
Re: is it common to proxy register route objects for the purpose of grouping them for use in an as-set
From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 15:06:19 -0500
What I can say as an operator of one IRR, is that any proxy object is killed on sight. So this DDoS mitigation provider will probably need to look elsewhere for pulling this off. Rubens On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 11:34 AM Steven Wallace <ssw () internet2 edu> wrote:
Greeting, One of the DDoS mitigation providers we work with creates proxy route objects for its customers’ prefixes. These route objects specify a common origin ASN rather than the actual origin ASN that would be seen in routing tables. Their rationale is to bind the prefixes to a single ASN, allowing the entire set of customer routes to be announced via an as-set. Is this a common approach? Just curious. thanks, steve Steven Wallace Director - Routing Integrity Internet2 ssw () internet2 edu
Current thread:
- is it common to proxy register route objects for the purpose of grouping them for use in an as-set Steven Wallace (Sep 26)
- Re: is it common to proxy register route objects for the purpose of grouping them for use in an as-set Niels Bakker (Sep 26)
- Re: is it common to proxy register route objects for the purpose of grouping them for use in an as-set Rubens Kuhl (Sep 26)
