nanog mailing list archives
Re: RFC 9234 route leak prevention in the wild!
From: Douglas Fischer <fischerdouglas () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 09:00:50 -0300
Em qui., 5 de set. de 2024 às 14:35, Jon Lewis <jlewis () lewis org> escreveu:
This may well be intentional
In addition to their own intention, they should ask if the other side agrees with that. I don't remember which research paper compiled this. But the top 5 ASNs targeted by the no_export_to<asn> BGP communities at IXP Route-Servers say a lot about who mostly causes this type of problem. -- Douglas Fernando Fischer Engº de Controle e Automação
Current thread:
- RFC 9234 route leak prevention in the wild! Job Snijders via NANOG (Sep 02)
- Re: RFC 9234 route leak prevention in the wild! Richard Laager via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: RFC 9234 route leak prevention in the wild! Jon Lewis (Sep 05)
- Re: RFC 9234 route leak prevention in the wild! Mike Leber via NANOG (Sep 07)
- Re: RFC 9234 route leak prevention in the wild! Douglas Fischer (Sep 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: RFC 9234 route leak prevention in the wild! Marinho Barcellos via NANOG (Sep 23)
