nanog mailing list archives
Re: 9.9.9.9 not taking DNS traffic over PCH through DE-CIX in Dallas
From: "Eric C. Miller via NANOG" <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 17:51:27 +0000
Email sent. Thank you for quick response! Eric ________________________________ From: John Todd <jtodd () quad9 net> Sent: Friday, August 15, 2025 12:15 PM To: North American Network Operators Group <nanog () lists nanog org> Cc: Eric C. Miller <eric () ericheather com> Subject: Re: 9.9.9.9 not taking DNS traffic over PCH through DE-CIX in Dallas On 15 Aug 2025, at 9:00, Eric C. Miller via NANOG wrote:
A mouthful, but we're seeing an issue where we can ping 9.9.9.9 but not get response to UDP/53 dns queries. Filtering the prefix 9.9.9.0/24 and taking transports seems to run fine. We're also seeing TCP Resets on SecureDNS. Anyone else seeing something similar? Eric
Hi Eric - Can you please send a full set of debugging to support () quad9 net and we'll take a look. Please include source IP, a traceroute when you have that path active, and exact timeframes of the issue. JT -- John Todd - jtodd () quad9 net - +41 44 527 99 23 Chief Technology Officer - Quad9 Recursive Resolver _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/UANT3H5X64IVVZ6DDZWW3BINLMLC645X/
Current thread:
- 9.9.9.9 not taking DNS traffic over PCH through DE-CIX in Dallas Eric C. Miller via NANOG (Aug 15)
- Re: 9.9.9.9 not taking DNS traffic over PCH through DE-CIX in Dallas John Todd via NANOG (Aug 15)
- Re: 9.9.9.9 not taking DNS traffic over PCH through DE-CIX in Dallas Eric C. Miller via NANOG (Aug 15)
- Re: 9.9.9.9 not taking DNS traffic over PCH through DE-CIX in Dallas John Todd via NANOG (Aug 15)
