nanog mailing list archives
Re: : Can a prefix be never routed on Internet but used only for source address in IP packets?
From: Nick Hilliard via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 11:08:31 +0100
nanog--- via NANOG wrote on 20/08/2025 04:10:
There's no prohibition here. It's an issue for the IXP's routing policy as to whether their peering lan prefix(es) should be announced or not. Some do, many don't.I believe IXP networks are usually like this. Globally assigned IPs, and routers can use their IPs on the network to originate ICMP packets (e.g. TTL exceeded during traceroute; or packet too big) but putting a route to the IXP network on the internet is strictly prohibited.
The thing that IXPs don't like is when second or third parties become inventive in ways that override the intention of the IXP, for example, originating the address block from their own ASN, or putting in special-case filters to single out ixp prefixes for special treatment, or that sort of thing. It would also help if connected parties used next-hop-self at their IXP routers so that peering lan prefixes are not carried in their IGPs.
Nick _______________________________________________NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/JXA7MLZZQDM4MST27TYYGXXUF4ECQFS3/
Current thread:
- Re: : Can a prefix be never routed on Internet but used only for source address in IP packets? Jakob Heitz (jheitz) via NANOG (Aug 19)
- Re: : Can a prefix be never routed on Internet but used only for source address in IP packets? nanog--- via NANOG (Aug 19)
- Re: : Can a prefix be never routed on Internet but used only for source address in IP packets? Randy Bush via NANOG (Aug 19)
- Re: : Can a prefix be never routed on Internet but used only for source address in IP packets? Nick Hilliard via NANOG (Aug 20)
- Re: : Can a prefix be never routed on Internet but used only for source address in IP packets? nanog--- via NANOG (Aug 19)
