nanog mailing list archives
Re: Link-state EGP
From: William Herrin via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2025 02:29:59 -0700
On Sat, Aug 23, 2025 at 7:49 AM Saku Ytti via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:
Why do we use distance vector EGP? Why do we advertise prefixes?
Because we like to get paid. The problem with a link-state protocol is that every link in the system is a valid transit for every routed prefix. We can control the link transit costs, prefer some paths over others, but there's no way to express that even though a particular prefix is attached to a node on the other side of this link, we're not under any circumstances permitted to use this link to reach it. As a result, we can only use a link-state protocol in a system where the subscriber has paid for the right to use -all- of the links in the system. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin bill () herrin us https://bill.herrin.us/ _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/JCLPQPMHYSNSDPJTEWKSDMSCV56U5UJS/
Current thread:
- Re: Link-state EGP, (continued)
- Re: Link-state EGP Jeffrey Haas via NANOG (Aug 24)
- Re: Link-state EGP nanog--- via NANOG (Aug 24)
- Re: Link-state EGP Saku Ytti via NANOG (Aug 24)
- Re[2]: Link-state EGP 7riw77--- via NANOG (Aug 25)
- Re: Re[2]: Link-state EGP Saku Ytti via NANOG (Aug 25)
- Re: Link-state EGP Saku Ytti via NANOG (Aug 23)
- Re: Link-state EGP Saku Ytti via NANOG (Aug 24)
- Re: Link-state EGP Andrey Kostin via NANOG (Aug 28)
- Re: Link-state EGP nanog--- via NANOG (Aug 24)
