nanog mailing list archives
Re: So am I just excitable?
From: Geoff Huston via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2025 10:11:13 +1000
On 30 Aug 2025, at 10:00 am, Brian Knight via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote: I see the cause of the discrepancy now. Bumped up our RIB against Route Views, and I see lots of disaggregation on Route Views that isn't present in our RIB. Had no idea we were being shielded from *that* many /24's. Many apologies for the Friday night stupidity :(
Absolutely no need to apologise - what you are seeing is that BGP is used for both basic reachability and traffic engineering, and the most reliable way for a route advertiser to dictate pol;icies to others is to use more specific prefixes. Little wonder that more specifics account for 52% of the BGP RIB in IPv4. Geoff _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/HLQAECGFQBVQPSF7TENICDNLSQDJD3N6/
Current thread:
- So am I just excitable? michael brooks - ESC via NANOG (Aug 29)
- Re: So am I just excitable? Nick Hilliard via NANOG (Aug 29)
- Re: So am I just excitable? Tom Beecher via NANOG (Aug 29)
- Re: So am I just excitable? michael brooks - ESC via NANOG (Aug 29)
- Re: So am I just excitable? Brian Knight via NANOG (Aug 29)
- Re: So am I just excitable? Randy Bush via NANOG (Aug 29)
- Re: So am I just excitable? Geoff Huston via NANOG (Aug 29)
- Re: So am I just excitable? Tom Beecher via NANOG (Aug 29)
- Re: So am I just excitable? Brian Knight via NANOG (Aug 29)
- Re: So am I just excitable? Geoff Huston via NANOG (Aug 29)
- Re: So am I just excitable? Philip Smith via NANOG (Aug 30)
- Re: So am I just excitable? Tony Tauber via NANOG (Aug 31)
- Re: So am I just excitable? Tom Beecher via NANOG (Aug 31)
