RE: Cisco ASR9902 SNMP polling ... is interesting

[Mikael Abrahamsson via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>]

On Fri, 8 Aug 2025, Drew Weaver via NANOG wrote:

> It could be bothered to do absolutely nothing and silently reject the 
> command which made me laugh for about 5 minutes this morning.

This wouldn't be the first time. An example of other case where this 
happened was when configuring traffic shaping, but the specific setup 
didn't have enough traffic manager bandwidth (4 port 10GE into a 35 
gigabit/s traffic manager if I remember correctly) so XR chose the path of 
least resistance and accepted the commit, decided it couldn't be 
implemented in HW, and got on with its life without saying anything.

--
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike () swm pp se
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/KON65223MAS3BM5AHAPZUN2V3HJF4OHS/