nanog mailing list archives
Re: Low Cost 400G??
From: Mark Tinka via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 15:57:05 +0200
On 15/12/2025 15:43, Mike Hammett via NANOG wrote:
*nods* Usually, I don't need lots of ports. Usually, just a few will do. That's the annoying thing: they usually come with (and I'm exaggerating to avoid getting caught up in minutiae) two high-speed ports or 50, but rarely six, eight, or ten.
The reduced density is because they know most customers need tons of 10G and 100G, compared to tons of 400G.
So the 400G real estate is optimized for 100G (and lower) breakout in a small(er) form factor, rather than native 400G scale.
For that, they'll be pushing you to a chassis with a gazillion line cards they can sell beautiful licenses on.
Mark. _______________________________________________NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/RHYRHPR7BIXZ4LZEOKP3I3IUFX2SKN4D/
Current thread:
- Low Cost 400G?? Mike Hammett via NANOG (Dec 14)
- Re: Low Cost 400G?? Tom Samplonius via NANOG (Dec 14)
- Re: Low Cost 400G?? Mark Tinka via NANOG (Dec 15)
- Re: Low Cost 400G?? Tom Beecher via NANOG (Dec 15)
- Re: Low Cost 400G?? Mark Tinka via NANOG (Dec 15)
- Re: Low Cost 400G?? Mike Hammett via NANOG (Dec 15)
- Re: Low Cost 400G?? Mark Tinka via NANOG (Dec 15)
- Re: Low Cost 400G?? Jesper Skriver via NANOG (Dec 15)
- Re: Low Cost 400G?? Darrel Lewis via NANOG (Dec 15)
- Re: Low Cost 400G?? Tom Samplonius via NANOG (Dec 14)
