nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cox AS22773 uPRF issue - please contact off list
From: "C. Jon Larsen via NANOG" <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 23:23:46 -0500 (EST)
strict urpf should only ever be enabled by providers when PA space is assigned, and typically thats on a static routed assignment, never a bgp session and typically never on a bgp session / peer with a customer that is multihomed, etc.
In other words I would tend to say Im not going to ever buy transit from you if you run strict uRPF on my ports.
+ Jon Larsen: CTO Richweb, Inc. + Richweb.com: Cloud/Route/Switch/MSP Experts since 1995 + GnuPG Public Key: http://jlarsen.richweb.com/jlarsen.gpg + Business: (804) 368-0421 x 101; Mobile: (804) 747-8592 _______________________________________________NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/HOLPB2PBSMHY57IQP6WGEVVYTNXVOFXU/
Current thread:
- Cox AS22773 uPRF issue - please contact off list Evan S. Weiner via NANOG (Dec 03)
- Re: Cox AS22773 uPRF issue - please contact off list C. Jon Larsen via NANOG (Dec 03)
- Re: Cox AS22773 uPRF issue - please contact off list Frank Habicht via NANOG (Dec 03)
- Re: Cox AS22773 uPRF issue - please contact off list William Herrin via NANOG (Dec 04)
- Re: Cox AS22773 uPRF issue - please contact off list Frank Habicht via NANOG (Dec 04)
- Re: Cox AS22773 uPRF issue - please contact off list Frank Habicht via NANOG (Dec 03)
- Re: Cox AS22773 uPRF issue - please contact off list Saku Ytti via NANOG (Dec 03)
- Re: Cox AS22773 uPRF issue - please contact off list C. Jon Larsen via NANOG (Dec 03)
