nanog mailing list archives
Re: Question about DNS naming conventions
From: Jack Bates <jbates () paradoxnetworks net>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 21:53:45 -0600
On 2/12/2025 2:34 PM, William Herrin wrote:
Most users don't have any idea and would allow an attacker to compromise their bank connection if given the choice. The defaults are designed to protect the majority?On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 9:58 AM Jack Bates <jbates () paradoxnetworks net> wrote:The software has no concept of what the data isWhich is why the software shouldn't be making a hard decision about appropriate cryptography. The users on the two ends, the folks who do know what the data is, should have the final say. The software should set sensible defaults and then let those users decide what to do about the large and growing gap of failure between the current default and the often still allowed unencrypted plain text.
I suspect --insecure has special meaning and shouldn't be overloaded to include anything that is "insecure". However, curl depends on the underlying libraries, and I believe it was those libraries that are being compiled and installed with older stuff disabled. A quick search shows you have to do custom builds to enable on any current system.That "curl https://enemieslist.com" returns a fault is not unreasonable. That "curl --insecure https://enemieslist.com" also fails reflects faulty thinking on the part of alleged security experts.
My personal pain point is out of band access to older servers. They're well past the manufacturer's maintenance so there are no more software updates. I can use nice modern VPN software to secure the channel between me and their LAN, but I have to maintain obsolete versions of web browsers and their dependent libraries along with obsolete versions of Java because the modern ones won't connect. I'd rather have less obsolete bug ridden software around, but the self-appointed security experts have stolen that choice from me.
In my experience, except for Java incompatibilities itself, you can usually tweak the configuration and exception rules to get Java to connect and accept older signed packages. Sometimes you have to retweak after an upgrade. FireFox appears to have quite a few options in about:config to enable older stuff and also supports exception lists for some things.
Of course, my experience is limited, and I may not be nearly as archaic as you.
Jack
Current thread:
- Re: Question about DNS naming conventions, (continued)
- Re: Question about DNS naming conventions William Herrin (Feb 11)
- Re: Question about DNS naming conventions John Levine (Feb 11)
- Re: Question about DNS naming conventions Steven Champeon (Feb 13)
- Re: Question about DNS naming conventions John Levine (Feb 11)
- Re: Question about DNS naming conventions Thomas Mieslinger via NANOG (Feb 12)
- Re: Question about DNS naming conventions Mark Tinka (Feb 12)
- Re: Question about DNS naming conventions Thomas Mieslinger via NANOG (Feb 12)
- Re: Question about DNS naming conventions Mark Tinka (Feb 12)
- Re: Question about DNS naming conventions nanog--- via NANOG (Feb 12)
- Re: Question about DNS naming conventions William Herrin (Feb 12)
- Re: Question about DNS naming conventions Jack Bates (Feb 12)
- Re: Question about DNS naming conventions William Herrin (Feb 12)
- Re: Question about DNS naming conventions Jack Bates (Feb 12)
- Re: Question about DNS naming conventions William Herrin (Feb 12)
- Re: Question about DNS naming conventions William Herrin (Feb 12)
- Re: Question about DNS naming conventions William Herrin (Feb 11)
