nanog mailing list archives
Re: BFD vs network brownouts
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 14:28:03 +0200
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 at 13:02, Jason Iannone <jason.iannone () gmail com> wrote:
Saku speaks from the privileged position of an infrastructure owner. We assume that interface connectivity is provided by L1 links, with OEO in transit nodes as a worst case. But the clever budget conscious among us have deployed router links over provided MPLS based L2 services as critical infrastructure. We have an invisible WAN. In the absence of L1 PM statistics, how do we validate service over other networks? 802.3ag and y.1731 attempt to answer that question.
Fair, yes OAM is likely least bad solution here. Or vendor proprietary solutions like Cisco IP SLA or Juniper RPM. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- BFD vs network brownouts David Zimmerman via NANOG (Jan 08)
- Re: BFD vs network brownouts Jason Iannone (Jan 08)
- Re: BFD vs network brownouts Saku Ytti (Jan 08)
- Re: BFD vs network brownouts Tom Beecher (Jan 09)
- Re: BFD vs network brownouts Alex Buie (Jan 09)
- Re: BFD vs network brownouts Tom Beecher (Jan 09)
- Re: BFD vs network brownouts Tore Anderson (Jan 09)
- Re: BFD vs network brownouts David Zimmerman via NANOG (Jan 09)
- Re: BFD vs network brownouts Saku Ytti (Jan 09)
- Re: BFD vs network brownouts Jason Iannone (Jan 10)
- Re: BFD vs network brownouts Saku Ytti (Jan 10)
- Re: BFD vs network brownouts Tore Anderson (Jan 12)
- Re: BFD vs network brownouts Saku Ytti (Jan 09)
