nanog mailing list archives
Re: 1.1.1.1
From: Randy Bush via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 12:06:06 -0700
anureg,
AS4755 does not do ROV. AS6453 does but only for peers, not downstream side yet.
these years, this seems ill-advised. back in the day, when we had less experience with rov, it might have been reasonably conservative; "they're paying me to accept." imiho, today it would seem to fall into a similar class as not in as-set: etc. but i gather opinions vary. randy _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/EHGHRHRVWOBHOKTZQZZKVBQNSORB62FO/
Current thread:
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1), (continued)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Tom Beecher via NANOG (Jul 18)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Robert Kisteleki via NANOG (Jul 18)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Jay Acuna via NANOG (Jul 17)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? Laszlo H via NANOG (Jul 17)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? Constantine A. Murenin via NANOG (Jul 17)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Tom Beecher via NANOG (Jul 17)
- Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Jay Acuna via NANOG (Jul 17)
- Re: 1.1.1.1 Stephane Bortzmeyer via NANOG (Jul 16)
- Re: 1.1.1.1 Randy Bush via NANOG (Jul 16)
- Re: 1.1.1.1 Anurag Bhatia via NANOG (Jul 17)
- Re: 1.1.1.1 Randy Bush via NANOG (Jul 17)
