nanog mailing list archives

Re: 1.1.1.1

From: Randy Bush via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 12:06:06 -0700

anureg,

AS4755 does not do ROV. AS6453 does but only for peers, not downstream
side yet.


these years, this seems ill-advised.

back in the day, when we had less experience with rov, it might have
been reasonably conservative; "they're paying me to accept."  imiho,
today it would seem to fall into a similar class as not in as-set:
etc.  but i gather opinions vary.

randy
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/EHGHRHRVWOBHOKTZQZZKVBQNSORB62FO/

Current thread:

Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1), (continued)
- - - Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Tom Beecher via NANOG (Jul 18)
    - Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Robert Kisteleki via NANOG (Jul 18)
    - Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Jay Acuna via NANOG (Jul 17)
    - Re: Are public DNS a good thing? Laszlo H via NANOG (Jul 17)
    - Re: Are public DNS a good thing? Constantine A. Murenin via NANOG (Jul 17)
    - Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Tom Beecher via NANOG (Jul 17)
    - Re: Are public DNS a good thing? (was: Re: 1.1.1.1) Jay Acuna via NANOG (Jul 17)
    - Re: 1.1.1.1 Stephane Bortzmeyer via NANOG (Jul 16)
    - Re: 1.1.1.1 Randy Bush via NANOG (Jul 16)
    - Re: 1.1.1.1 Anurag Bhatia via NANOG (Jul 17)
    - Re: 1.1.1.1 Randy Bush via NANOG (Jul 17)