nanog mailing list archives

Please disregard my n00b reply-all


From: jonathan via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 17:19:23 -0700

  
  

  

  

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Jonathan Kalbfeld

 office:   +1 310 317 7933
 fax:         +1 310 317 7901
 home:       +1 310 317 7909
 mobile:   +1 310 227 1662
  
  ThoughtWave Technologies, Inc.
 Studio City, CA 91604
  
https://thoughtwave.com
  

  
  
View our network at   
  
https://bgp.he.net/AS54380
  

  
+1 844 42-LINUX
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
On Jul 21, 2025 at 5:17 PM, jonathan via NANOG  <nanog () lists nanog org>  wrote:
  
  
  
  
  
Hey are you related to Jonah?
  

  

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Jonathan Kalbfeld

 office: +1 310 317 7933
 fax: +1 310 317 7901
 home: +1 310 317 7909
 mobile: +1 310 227 1662
  
 ThoughtWave Technologies, Inc.
 Studio City, CA 91604
  
https://thoughtwave.com
  

  
  
View our network at  
  
https://bgp.he.net/AS54380
  

  
+1 844 42-LINUX
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 On Jul 21, 2025 at 2:41 PM, Ron Yokubaitis via NANOG  <nanog () lists nanog org>  wrote:
  
  
 "Hard cases make good Law."

 RonY
 Sent from my iPhone

  >  On Jul 21, 2025, at 4:03 PM, Mel Beckman via NANOG  <nanog () lists nanog org>  wrote:
  >   
  >  David,
  >   
  >  Thank you for supplying the factual data I was looking for. I’m happy to now accept “most”.
  >   
  >  Let us hope the slippery slope of anonymizing registration data doesn’t creep into ARIN!
  >   
  >  -mel
  >   
  >  On Jul 21, 2025, at 1:24 PM, David Conrad  <drc () virtualized org>  wrote:
  >   
  >  On Jul 19, 2025, at 5:41 PM, Mel Beckman  <mel () beckman org>  wrote:
  >  It’s not that I’m “going somewhere” with this comment. I’m just looking for factual data, not wild guesses. 
I’ll accept “some” for now.
  >   
  >  They weren’t "wild guesses”. As mentioned, my comments regarding registrars redacting for privacy was in 
relation to my discussions with law enforcement. This would appear to be corroborated by John McCormac’s post that 
pointed to  
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.dnib.com_articles_interisle-2Dreport-2Dexamines-2Ddomain-2Dname-2Dcontact-2Ddata-2Davailability&d=DwIGaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=cGrDT0liF-gD_o4EJ7o_qg&m=j0RyxXxwnpCmSqoSZYvbAwrZgb09c8cpYDfGWknN0HfiGA4donrvcrH83MttE3st&s=HNhAt6Xw9R20rk1Pj0Tj-ITXDLXG90K7EXYZiuBTWTY&e=
  which seems to confirm “most” (if not “if not all”). The TL;DR quote from that paper:
  >   
  >  "Since 2018, registrars also have expanded and promoted free privacy proxy service offerings. Of the 20 
largest registrars included in the study, which collectively account for more than 70% of gTLD registrations, a 
majority offer free proxy services, removing financial barriers to proxy use for the majority of gTLD registrants.”
  >   
  >  Since my day job causes me to be somewhat involved in never ending registration data debacle, I did a quick 
check of the top registrars by market share John listed. It appears:
  >   
  >  Godaddy (27.6% market share): privacy on by default for all eligible new domains
  >  Namecheap (8.04%): privacy on by default for all eligible new domains
  >  Tucows (includes Enom and Hover, 4.3%): on by default for all eligible new domains
  >  Squarespace (formerly Google, 3.3%): on by default for all eligible new domains
  >  GMO Internet (includes  
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__onamae.com&d=DwIGaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=cGrDT0liF-gD_o4EJ7o_qg&m=j0RyxXxwnpCmSqoSZYvbAwrZgb09c8cpYDfGWknN0HfiGA4donrvcrH83MttE3st&s=uoaC7ef9fHZuYnOyn_w5D7ieZzQ-MCyy9ga_QBVpsHc&e=
  and  
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__z.com&d=DwIGaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=cGrDT0liF-gD_o4EJ7o_qg&m=j0RyxXxwnpCmSqoSZYvbAwrZgb09c8cpYDfGWknN0HfiGA4donrvcrH83MttE3st&s=MRl6alNNS_i0U5Bq8CXDNH4qCDW0qv4u9c5QR78WyuY&e=,
 2.37%): on by default for all eligible new domains
  >  Dynadot (2.21%): on by default for all eligible new domains
  >  Netsol: (2.16%): NOT on by default, a $9.99 added service
  >  Gname: (2.12%): NOT on by default, free for all eligible new domains
  >   
  >  (I was only able to find one other registrar that doesn’t have privacy on by default, Bluehost, but I didn’t 
bother figuring out their market share or doing a further, exhaustive survey)
  >   
  >  Translating that to operational impact, according to the first line of the  
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__dnib.com&d=DwIGaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=cGrDT0liF-gD_o4EJ7o_qg&m=j0RyxXxwnpCmSqoSZYvbAwrZgb09c8cpYDfGWknN0HfiGA4donrvcrH83MttE3st&s=5ZsrGJY45ZbllizLyKjX1emApZIBr1LeQ-TuDxc_TNY&e=
  paper, about "Nearly 90% of the internet’s generic top-level domain (gTLD) names do not have identifying contact 
information in the Registration Data Directory Services (RDDS) system […]”.
  >   
  >  Is every good scientist knows, the absence of data is not data, and the plural of anecdote is not data :-)
  >   
  >  Ironically, the original aphorism was “the plural of anecdote is data” (see  
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__web.archive.org_web_20080523225000_http-3A__listserv.linguistlist.org_cgi-2Dbin_wa-3FA2-3Dind0407a-26L-3Dads-2Dl-26P-3D8874&d=DwIGaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=cGrDT0liF-gD_o4EJ7o_qg&m=j0RyxXxwnpCmSqoSZYvbAwrZgb09c8cpYDfGWknN0HfiGA4donrvcrH83MttE3st&s=QkUD_G-cq1lqEdKXDmHSbmGs-glweWBR0jxpODvg1Eg&e=).
  >   
  >  Regards,
  >  -drc
  >   
  >   
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__signature.asc&d=DwIGaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=cGrDT0liF-gD_o4EJ7o_qg&m=j0RyxXxwnpCmSqoSZYvbAwrZgb09c8cpYDfGWknN0HfiGA4donrvcrH83MttE3st&s=8ENcEhGfP9eqIBumbAp1m6lHbRhFJKyQd-ZhwY5jZio&e=>
  >  _______________________________________________
  >  NANOG mailing list
  >   
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.nanog.org_archives_list_nanog-40lists.nanog.org_message_FLKJDDSLRNAOCMQCVRQ5YBG4LFHJ6TBA_&d=DwIGaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=cGrDT0liF-gD_o4EJ7o_qg&m=j0RyxXxwnpCmSqoSZYvbAwrZgb09c8cpYDfGWknN0HfiGA4donrvcrH83MttE3st&s=BjYFzTJZ8A6LT08zu-r8Jv2bTgdC9gbao7YG4PD-cBw&e=
 _______________________________________________
 NANOG mailing list  
  https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/EMJ5I5QAOO7OXUPEM3O2QTNLOPYFFCGB/   
  
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list  
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/B4BDSKKCWFBMKJTFWFW3SAQQFYUYFPQY/     
     
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/XNWVIYKUU6EVMILZVGCGAPTXM2IL6DW5/

Current thread: