nanog mailing list archives
Re: address fragmentation
From: Lu Heng via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 18:04:50 +0800
Hi Brandon: The difference is control. If you lease to a different network, or give an IP to a server you rented to a customer, yes, in both cases you will have customer consensus to renumber them, but since leasing at minimum /24, but most hosting customer are in single IP, the difficulty and challenge are quite different. The discussion I like to see if there will be an best operation practice in assigning those IPs to avoid fragmentation in the long run. On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 at 18:00, Brandon Butterworth via NANOG < nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:
On 03/07/2025 08:49:07, "Lu Heng via NANOG" <nanog () lists nanog org> wroteWith the increasing prevalence of address‐space leasing—effectively operating as “mini‐RIRs” for IP distribution—fragmentation of address blocks has become a critical concern.How is that different from a regular provider assigning space (a LIR in RIPE terms)? They just need to keep the RIR data current for all their assignments, they are in no sense a mini RIR, that is a different function. As they are just renting out space that otherwise would have been allocated to a LIR then they should operate as a LIR. brandon _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/VUELL36OROUP6CPSMKSFK3W5CCOFWPHG/
-- -- Kind regards. Lu _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/LIRRYK63WJKC3EJEXTOR5M42ZIJ52RR4/
Current thread:
- address fragmentation Lu Heng via NANOG (Jul 03)
- Re: address fragmentation Brandon Butterworth via NANOG (Jul 03)
- Re: address fragmentation Lu Heng via NANOG (Jul 03)
- Re: address fragmentation Brandon Butterworth via NANOG (Jul 03)
- Re: address fragmentation Lu Heng via NANOG (Jul 03)
- Re: address fragmentation Brandon Butterworth via NANOG (Jul 03)
