[NANOG] Re: IPv6 Legacy IP Warning Stickers

[William Herrin via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>]

On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 1:25 PM Brandon Martin via NANOG
<nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:
> Until consumers care, bulk-subscriber driven residential ISPs probably
> won't care.  They have to provide IPv4 anyway, and most of the startups
> are stuck running CGNAT to do it already, so IPv6 is just another
> operational hassle for them.

I'm not sure why a modern ISP would fail to at least deploy the
minimum for IPv6: 6rd is easy enough to implement and if you don't
_automatically_ enable it for customers then it doesn't have to be as
efficient as your IPv4 offering.

Regards,
Bill Herrin

--
William Herrin
bill () herrin us
https://bill.herrin.us/
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/AQNXANVBT4M4GSGBTERYWHUWSQNICHM5/