Re: Trivial change in Public Cert behaviour coming soon

[Bjørn Mork via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>]

John Levine via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> writes:

> This is a waste of time.  If people want to believe that SMTP clients send
> certificates, there's not much I can do to persuade them otherwise.

Let's just disagree then.

But when my secondary MX receives an email and later forwards it to my
primary MX over a mTLS channel, then I call that SMTP.  If you want to
call it submission because the secondary MX operates as an authenticated
client, then fine.

> But in any event, I hope we have established that the number of people
> affected by the LE change to stop signing client certs rounds to zero.

Sure.


Bjørn
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/AIZ7R7U66GNBAFU5NHDVAVOFJCZCKPEK/