nanog mailing list archives
Re: RE: [Ext] my finance department cares deeply about 2%
From: Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 12:06:59 +0000
I am not checking my emails until Nov 14th, 2025. Thanks, Samaneh On Nov 6, 2025, at 6:52 PM, nanog--- via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote: So you use header compression on all your links, right? No sense reducing your 1Gbps main uplink to 0.98Gbps. The checksum (removed in v6) is already 5% of each IP packet header. Speaking of headers I take it you're using SLIP instead of Ethernet? And you avoid TLS like the plague? I hope you replaced your 15W LED bulbs with 14.7W bulbs as well - your finance department will thank you. This is asinine. On 6 November 2025 13:11:16 CET, Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> wrote: Tell any financial department that 2% does not matter and see the reaction. Ed/ -----Original Message----- From: Marco Moock via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2025 14:53 To: North American Network Operators Group <nanog () lists nanog org> Cc: Marco Moock <mm () dorfdsl de> Subject: Re: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) On 06.11.2025 07:12 Vasilenko Eduard wrote: The issue that 128bits (64+64) are wasted in every packet. Formally, for "privacy". Content providers are lathing from such form or privacy. But it is 2% of the internet capacity. No one cares nowadays. The amount of other crap traffic (scrapers, AI, spam, DDoS attacks) is a real problem, the additional bits in the header aren't. The time of slow dialup connections where every bit matters, is over. _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/GQ5AQ75WAWRXFYS54QLFQAUMDGCM4QV4/__;!!PtGJab4!6nDShAgWCumsm_TMLHcNQT9B-QWiPVO2HNRjk6ZQUXzbmmPJBQze9D0ZbLzQyzJfOq9kHGsKgv5db_WTzM7Tj0GzZMc$ [lists[.]nanog[.]org] _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/3WJNGJSN3R252QI7CWBDOTAL37LNQFIH/__;!!PtGJab4!6nDShAgWCumsm_TMLHcNQT9B-QWiPVO2HNRjk6ZQUXzbmmPJBQze9D0ZbLzQyzJfOq9kHGsKgv5db_WTzM7T9XCCuXM$ [lists[.]nanog[.]org] _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/ZYNMIDYAXYZMGQJT2VX36DZIEY5XHNYC/__;!!PtGJab4!6nDShAgWCumsm_TMLHcNQT9B-QWiPVO2HNRjk6ZQUXzbmmPJBQze9D0ZbLzQyzJfOq9kHGsKgv5db_WTzM7TWrY1OLI$ [lists[.]nanog[.]org] _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/M53SHUH5DVTBL6GBL5K4HSYNIZO7RRZS/
Current thread:
- Re: my finance department cares deeply about 2%, (continued)
- Re: my finance department cares deeply about 2% brent saner via NANOG (Nov 08)
- Re: Re: [Ext] my finance department cares deeply about 2% Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG (Nov 10)
- Re: Re: Re: [Ext] my finance department cares deeply about 2% Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG (Nov 10)
- Re: Re: [Ext] my finance department cares deeply about 2% Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG (Nov 10)
- Re: my finance department cares deeply about 2% Saku Ytti via NANOG (Nov 07)
- Re: my finance department cares deeply about 2% Marco Moock via NANOG (Nov 07)
- Re: my finance department cares deeply about 2% Saku Ytti via NANOG (Nov 07)
- Re: Re: [Ext] my finance department cares deeply about 2% Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG (Nov 10)
- Re: Re: Re: [Ext] my finance department cares deeply about 2% Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG (Nov 10)
- Re: Re: [Ext] my finance department cares deeply about 2% Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG (Nov 10)
- Re: RE: [Ext] my finance department cares deeply about 2% Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG (Nov 10)
- Re: RE: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG (Nov 10)
- Re: Re: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG (Nov 10)
- Re: RE: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG (Nov 10)
- Re: Re: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG (Nov 10)
- Re: RE: [Ext] Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob via NANOG (Nov 10)
- Re: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Andrew Kirch via NANOG (Nov 05)
- Re: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Marco Moock via NANOG (Nov 05)
- Re: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Andrew Kirch via NANOG (Nov 05)
- RE: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Nov 05)
- Re: Artificial Juniper SRX limitations preventing IPv6 deployment (and sales) Marco Moock via NANOG (Nov 05)
