nanog mailing list archives
Re: Paging Unified Layer/AS46606 in re: NET-162-240-0-0-1 (162.240.0.0/15)
From: Josh Luthman via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 09:45:18 -0400
That's what fires do - they grow :) On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 9:44 AM Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net> wrote:
Until it isn't. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP ----- Original Message ----- From: "Josh Luthman" <josh () imaginenetworksllc com> To: "North American Network Operators Group" <nanog () lists nanog org> Cc: "Mike Hammett" <nanog () ics-il net> Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2025 8:43:37 AM Subject: Re: Paging Unified Layer/AS46606 in re: NET-162-240-0-0-1 ( 162.240.0.0/15) Why bother putting out the small fire? It's only a small fire. On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 9:40 AM Mike Hammett via NANOG < nanog () lists nanog org > wrote: and yet just being okay with background radiation only encourages the background radiation to no longer just lurk in the background. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP ----- Original Message ----- From: "nanog--- via NANOG" < nanog () lists nanog org > To: "North American Network Operators Group" < nanog () lists nanog org > Cc: nanog () immibis com Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2025 3:05:55 AM Subject: Re: Paging Unified Layer/AS46606 in re: NET-162-240-0-0-1 ( 162.240.0.0/15 ) Who even bothers to complain about internet background radiation? Unless you're seeing a high volume or you know you have weak passwords... Otherwise there are plenty of machines out there searching for default SSH passwords. Just ignore them if they don't affect you. Many people configure SSH to run on a non-default port number to cut down on background noise. Or you can filter IPs as already suggested. Or you can know that you're using a strong authentication method and you're patched for CVE-2024-6387/6409, and leave it be. Please note that reporting abuse for non-incidents is itself an attack. There was an attack last year where someone sent spoofed port 22 SYN packets from IP addresses of Tor relays, resulting in a flood of trigger-happy "security" companies writing abuse emails to hosts of Tor relays who weren't involved, risking taking down large parts of the Tor network. On 4 September 2025 03:16:17 CEST, Rich Kulawiec via NANOG < nanog () lists nanog org > wrote:Who puts a quota on an abuse mailbox...and then allows that quote to be reached?Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 12:38:24 +0000 Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups: abuse () bluehost com <mailto: abuse () bluehost com > The recipient's mailbox is full and can't accept messages now. Pleasetry r=esending your message later, or contact the recipient directly.I've got nothin': my usual string of exasperated profanities has failedme.Anyway, y'all have attackers using various VPS instances on your network to conduct coordinated brute-force ssh attacks, and you should make that stop yesterday. Details? Logs? Yes, yes, I know, I did try to send them to you -- but see the above for the explanation covering why you didn't receive them. Also: for the love of dog, fix this nonsense. ---rsk _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing listhttps://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/6CFCYFIP5FHUL4PBZQNOUV2SW6DNK44U/ _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/A2ZFPUI7XEE4YHM7QJ433TWBRCLMYAYA/ _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/ZDCAEF7Z72EHJC3QWNFHTAPTIZ76VF6O/
_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/HF4SFNBVTWVC4JGVH4NQGEHXBUHOGHPV/
Current thread:
- Paging Unified Layer/AS46606 in re: NET-162-240-0-0-1 (162.240.0.0/15) Rich Kulawiec via NANOG (Sep 03)
- Re: Paging Unified Layer/AS46606 in re: NET-162-240-0-0-1 (162.240.0.0/15) Ryan Hamel via NANOG (Sep 03)
- Re: Paging Unified Layer/AS46606 in re: NET-162-240-0-0-1 (162.240.0.0/15) Adam Blackington via NANOG (Sep 03)
- Re: Paging Unified Layer/AS46606 in re: NET-162-240-0-0-1 (162.240.0.0/15) nanog--- via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Paging Unified Layer/AS46606 in re: NET-162-240-0-0-1 (162.240.0.0/15) Mike Hammett via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Paging Unified Layer/AS46606 in re: NET-162-240-0-0-1 (162.240.0.0/15) Josh Luthman via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Paging Unified Layer/AS46606 in re: NET-162-240-0-0-1 (162.240.0.0/15) Mike Hammett via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Paging Unified Layer/AS46606 in re: NET-162-240-0-0-1 (162.240.0.0/15) Josh Luthman via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Paging Unified Layer/AS46606 in re: NET-162-240-0-0-1 (162.240.0.0/15) Tom Beecher via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Paging Unified Layer/AS46606 in re: NET-162-240-0-0-1 (162.240.0.0/15) Mike Hammett via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Paging Unified Layer/AS46606 in re: NET-162-240-0-0-1 (162.240.0.0/15) Tom Beecher via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Paging Unified Layer/AS46606 in re: NET-162-240-0-0-1 (162.240.0.0/15) Mike Hammett via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Paging Unified Layer/AS46606 in re: NET-162-240-0-0-1 (162.240.0.0/15) Mike Hammett via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Paging Unified Layer/AS46606 in re: NET-162-240-0-0-1 (162.240.0.0/15) Tyler Kerr via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: Paging Unified Layer/AS46606 in re: NET-162-240-0-0-1 (162.240.0.0/15) Ryan Hamel via NANOG (Sep 03)
