nanog mailing list archives

Re: MD5 is slow


From: Saku Ytti via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 21:23:11 +0300

On Mon, 8 Sept 2025 at 11:00, Vasilenko Eduard
<vasilenko.eduard () huawei com> wrote:

Your comments on the performance are very important.
I still believe that any Hash must be slow enough, because if it were fast, then the attacker could take a big GPU 
and brute force it
(The routing message is very predictable; only the password is not known, but could be tested from the dictionary).
But what is slow? us or ms?
In support of the latter, look to https://www.ijcna.org/Manuscripts/IJCNA-2020-O-01.pdf.
It is hundreds of cycles per byte.
Acceleration helps, but not much (around 3x) https://github.com/minio/sha256-simd/blob/master/README.md.
A few milliseconds per every hop is expensive.

All of these questions have been addressed already in the thread. I'm
not sure what to do here, should we repeat the answers?

-- 
  ++ytti
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/BC4RSKSTTPCVEYCDPP5H4MTG6HSFD5EE/


Current thread: