
nanog mailing list archives
Re: MD5 is slow
From: Saku Ytti via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 21:23:11 +0300
On Mon, 8 Sept 2025 at 11:00, Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard () huawei com> wrote:
Your comments on the performance are very important. I still believe that any Hash must be slow enough, because if it were fast, then the attacker could take a big GPU and brute force it (The routing message is very predictable; only the password is not known, but could be tested from the dictionary). But what is slow? us or ms? In support of the latter, look to https://www.ijcna.org/Manuscripts/IJCNA-2020-O-01.pdf. It is hundreds of cycles per byte. Acceleration helps, but not much (around 3x) https://github.com/minio/sha256-simd/blob/master/README.md. A few milliseconds per every hop is expensive.
All of these questions have been addressed already in the thread. I'm not sure what to do here, should we repeat the answers? -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/BC4RSKSTTPCVEYCDPP5H4MTG6HSFD5EE/
Current thread:
- MD5 is slow Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Sep 05)
- Re: MD5 is slow Saku Ytti via NANOG (Sep 05)
- Re: MD5 is slow Saku Ytti via NANOG (Sep 05)
- RE: MD5 is slow Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Sep 08)
- Re: MD5 is slow Saku Ytti via NANOG (Sep 08)
- Re: MD5 is fast nanog--- via NANOG (Sep 08)
- Re: MD5 is fast Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 08)
- Re: MD5 is slow Jay Acuna via NANOG (Sep 08)
- RE: MD5 is slow Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Sep 08)
- Re: MD5 is slow Dan Collins via NANOG (Sep 05)
- Re: MD5 is slow brent saner via NANOG (Sep 05)
- Re: MD5 is slow Jay Acuna via NANOG (Sep 05)
- RE: MD5 is slow Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Sep 08)
- Re: MD5 is slow Jeffrey Haas via NANOG (Sep 08)
- RE: MD5 is slow Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Sep 08)
- Re: MD5 is slow Randy Bush via NANOG (Sep 05)
- Re: MD5 is slow Randy Bush via NANOG (Sep 05)