Re: AQM for QUIC HTTP/3

[borg--- via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>]

Just drop it and it will failover to TCP?
Or just police it like normal flows? I heard its addaptive...


---------- Original message ----------

From: Jason Iannone via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
To: North American Network Operators Group <nanog () lists nanog org>
Cc: Jason Iannone <jason.iannone () gmail com>
Subject: AQM for QUIC HTTP/3
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2026 09:34:08 -0500

Hi all,

Someone posted to r/networking about QUIC that raised a question for me. Is
anyone, proprietary or not, looking at AQM for QUIC? We have line rate
MAC-Sec and ASIC level IPSec is on the way.

I mean, if I'm an application owner and I want the pipe, why wouldn't I
just take it all with my unfair UDP flows? Thanks, Google!

Jason
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/OBFENPXXE36OVJQXI2L42DLJF5BIONZH/
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/7UYXVSG3DNU5BNSJTZ7G3ZHOE5FFC2C3/