nanog mailing list archives

Re: RTBH Support Across the Industry


From: Saku Ytti via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 09:12:29 +0300

Sure, I'll take the ER.

We are requesting a multi RTR db solution from Nokia, as well as ASN
origin-check (like junos, iosxr) to facilitate 'prefixless' IRR
validation via synthetic RPKI coverage.

I'm on the fence calling JNPR approach hacky, I'd more inclined to
call it expressive, where design allows emergent features to be
implemented that were not specifically designed. This is a common
theme comparing Junos and IOS-XR, expressive or specific.

I understand what you are asking 'rpki-valid-or-longer', and how that
is more convenient than setting up a second RTR database, but also
it's less expressive and has less control. I am not against it, just
undecided if I should penalise Juniper asking specific features when
functionality already can be met.

On Tue, 28 Jul 2026 at 21:49, Bryton Herdes <bryton () cloudflare com> wrote:

Yes it is possible in JunOS and BIRD both, JunOS with some hackery. I’m talking about formally supported knobs from 
the big vendors.

 If you’re interested in the feature request IDs I’ve submitted to Juniper/HPE and Cisco I’m happy to provide those 
off-list, or you can see them in my NANOG 98 slides in a few months.

--
Bryton Herdes
Principal Network Engineer
AS13335 - Cloudflare

On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 2:23 PM Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi> wrote:

On Tue, 28 Jul 2026 at 19:58, Bryton Herdes via NANOG
<nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:

I’ve went back and forth on solutions for RTBH, and my latest opinion is
vendors should implement a separate knob to bypass maxLength checking for
specifically routes tagged as BLACKHOLE, and still validate origin AS via
RPKI-ROV. The risk of operators using such a knob in “a bad way” is known,
but we need this tool. Let’s talk about this more at NANOG 98.

Yes. And this is possible today on Junos, as Martin Tonusoo shared in
this list (not this thread) earlier.

--
  ++ytti



-- 
  ++ytti
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/GCSARPWCT52FZRWIXD6MTHKMH5AIML5N/

Current thread: