Re: Standard MTU for SJFs and support for MEF 3.0 AI payloads

[Mark Tinka via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>]

On 09/03/2026 22:48, Majdi S. Abbas via NANOG wrote:
>         * It's probably also worth noting that as long as equipment
> vendors only support N nested tags/labels, additional MTU might not be
> a huge help by itself.

I tend to agree.

I don't think there is any practical utility in raising the jumbo frame 
MTU by MEF's new standards given not only the current state of 
equipment, but also, the current state of MTU operations in the 
Internet's networks.

Mark.
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/3YM5DZOTVAXYODGMAZ4T6E7VR62QJOR4/