nanog mailing list archives
Re: Correctly dealing with bots and scrapers.
From: Andrew Kirch via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2026 12:08:20 -0400
Modern scrapers will eventually move on. Generating a large amount of AI hallucinations with a crappy LLM will do the maximum damage before it goes. Andrew On Sat, Mar 21, 2026 at 11:59 AM Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com> wrote:
Ron Guilmette / rfg wrote this perl tool he called wpoison back in the 90s that’d feed junk email addresses to spambots. If a 90s Perl script can do this i seriously doubt we need an LLM of any sort. Why waste all that compute just to give scrapers indigestion? --srs ------------------------------ *From:* Andrew Kirch via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> *Sent:* Saturday, March 21, 2026 9:23:00 PM *To:* North American Network Operators Group <nanog () lists nanog org> *Cc:* Andrew Kirch <trelane () trelane net> *Subject:* Re: Correctly dealing with bots and scrapers. Get a small version of a very old very fast very inaccurate LLM. Have it generate a couple terabytes of endless nonsense. Redirect scrapers to it, and poison whatever LLM they are trying to train. Andrew On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 12:49 PM Andrew Latham via NANOG < nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:I just had an issue with a web-server where I had to block a /18 of a large scraper. I have some topics I could use some input on. 1. What tools or setups have people found most successful for dealing with bots/scrapers that do not respect robots.txt for example? 2. What tools for response rate limiting deal with bots/scrapers that cycle over a large variety of IPs with the exact same user agent? 3. Has anyone written or found a tool to concentrate IP addresses into networks for IPTABLES or NFT? (60% of IPs for network X in list so add network X and remove individual IP entries.) -- - Andrew "lathama" Latham - _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing listhttps://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/Z2J6CFBKU3ARYSQYKBRDCV6ZFUOS3WMU/_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/7N5RWJOU745D4GV4C3FQYQQQ2WTKOJOR/
_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/SOPURKAQUD2I3C2LJUTKX6A36SHIZVSL/
Current thread:
- Re: Correctly dealing with bots and scrapers., (continued)
- Re: Correctly dealing with bots and scrapers. Marco Moock via NANOG (Mar 21)
- Re: Correctly dealing with bots and scrapers. Andrew Latham via NANOG (Mar 21)
- Re: Correctly dealing with bots and scrapers. Andrew Kirch via NANOG (Mar 21)
- Re: Correctly dealing with bots and scrapers. Andrew Latham via NANOG (Mar 21)
- Re: Correctly dealing with bots and scrapers. Andrew Latham via NANOG (Mar 25)
- Re: Correctly dealing with bots and scrapers. Maurice Brown via NANOG (Mar 25)
- Re: Correctly dealing with bots and scrapers. Andrew Latham via NANOG (Mar 21)
- Re: Correctly dealing with bots and scrapers. Suresh Ramasubramanian via NANOG (Mar 21)
- Re: Correctly dealing with bots and scrapers. Marco Moock via NANOG (Mar 21)
- Re: Correctly dealing with bots and scrapers. Suresh Ramasubramanian via NANOG (Mar 21)
- Re: Correctly dealing with bots and scrapers. John Levine via NANOG (Mar 21)
- Re: Correctly dealing with bots and scrapers. Andrew Kirch via NANOG (Mar 21)
- Re: Correctly dealing with bots and scrapers. Mike Simpson via NANOG (Mar 21)
- Re: Correctly dealing with bots and scrapers. Marco Moock via NANOG (Mar 21)
