nanog mailing list archives
Re: "Peering Router"
From: Seth Mattinen via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2026 13:12:32 -0700
On 4/30/26 17:40, Mike Hammett via NANOG wrote:
Not that we have expected everyone we talked to would join our IX, but the answer that some gave puzzled me. There have been a few variations of "We don't have a peering router in that market." All routers peer, so what does that mean to you? How do people use that term?
I personally don't mix transit and peering duties on the same device. I have a dedicated router for peering sessions and a dedicated router for each transit provider. I find it easier to manage and it limits scope if one of them has a problem or needs an update since it only affects its own playground.
_______________________________________________NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/KVFAKEJEAZYUECSZBNNNV4J2SHYYYRJP/
Current thread:
- Re: "Peering Router" Mike Hammett via NANOG (May 04)
- Re: "Peering Router" Mike Hammett via NANOG (May 04)
- Re: "Peering Router" Chris Woodfield via NANOG (May 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: "Peering Router" Phil Bedard via NANOG (May 04)
- Re: "Peering Router" Seth Mattinen via NANOG (May 08)
- Re: "Peering Router" Mike Hammett via NANOG (May 04)
