Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF

[Jamie Thain via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>]

Marco

And ipv6 is no where on there radar. So fix ipv4.

I appreciate your input.

Jamie

On Sun., May 3, 2026, 4:33 a.m. Marco Moock via NANOG, <
nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:

> Am 03.05.26 um 00:30 schrieb Jamie Thain via NANOG:
> >   * IPv6 wasn't a surgical fix for address exhaustion — it bundled the
> >     address-space change with a full redesign of neighbor discovery,
> >     autoconfiguration, header structure, and operational tooling.
>
> That wasn't the issue. The issue is that it takes some time to prepare
> and do the implementation of another network protocol, regardless how it
> is called or how it works in detail. No one cares about ARP, nor NDP. It
> is there and works.
>
> Corporate networks need address plan, firewall plans etc. and that needs
> to be extended if any new protocol is going to be implemented.
>
> --
> Gruß
> Marco
>
> Junk-Mail bitte an trashcan () stinkedores dorfdsl de
> _______________________________________________
> NANOG mailing list
>
> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/LZX6VCZU5UMMHFQRIH5ZHJEK3I6V2ST4/
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/AVIU5UM7TNRP7DARNQCQXX6EVBJRANVR/