nanog mailing list archives
Re: RFC 10023 - A DNS convention for signalling domains for sale
From: Chris via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2026 09:29:07 -0800
On 2026-11-01 09:04, Al Iverson via NANOG wrote:
Gosh, it would be terrible if folks were to use this DNS record as a negative reputation indicator, suggesting that it might be best to disallow mail or traffic from a domain given that it is likely owned by a domain speculator or hoarder.
If you hold the position that CyberSquatters suck and return NXDOMAIN on this resource for all your customers as a service. Doesn't this sort of reverse it's purposed intent? _______________________________________________NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/C5QUVPO64HHVLUYYG4EMV6PJSTNWEW5K/
Current thread:
- Re: RFC 10023 - A DNS convention for signalling domains for sale Al Iverson via NANOG (Nov 01)
- RE: RFC 10023 - A DNS convention for signalling domains for sale Adam Maloney via NANOG (Nov 01)
- Re: RFC 10023 - A DNS convention for signalling domains for sale John Levine via NANOG (Nov 01)
- RE: RFC 10023 - A DNS convention for signalling domains for sale Adam Maloney via NANOG (Nov 02)
- RE: RFC 10023 - A DNS convention for signalling domains for sale John R. Levine via NANOG (Nov 02)
- Re: RFC 10023 - A DNS convention for signalling domains for sale John Levine via NANOG (Nov 01)
- RE: RFC 10023 - A DNS convention for signalling domains for sale Adam Maloney via NANOG (Nov 01)
- Re: RFC 10023 - A DNS convention for signalling domains for sale Chris via NANOG (Nov 02)
- Re: RFC 10023 - A DNS convention for signalling domains for sale John Levine via NANOG (Nov 02)
