nanog mailing list archives

Re: image macros on NANOG


From: michael brooks - ESC via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 08:25:23 -0600

Thank you Mr. Beecher, and though I agree the size of the image is small, I
do have to agree with Mr Tillery that the image is inappropriate use of
NANOG, and *the time of hundreds of network operators far above my
level.* After
sending it, in an attempt to *be at least slightly useful* by providing
some Friday afternoon levity, I did second guess sending the meme, and
wished I had utilized my mother's wisdom and used my words instead.

Apologies to those I ruffled, and I promise *any standard I apply to myself*
 in the future will be, at least, an effort to equal the esteem gathered
here.




michael brooks
Enterprise Network Architect
Adams 12 Five Star Schools
michael.brooks () adams12 org
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
"flying is learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss"



On Sun, Sep 6, 2026 at 10:05 AM Tom Beecher <beecher () beecher cc> wrote:

Whilst I may not be a fan of all the signature fufu that some people
include in their emails, Mr. Brooks' entire message, inclusive of
headers, is 16.2KB. Excluding headers, 2.1KB.

A fair bit away from 'most of a megabyte' I would say.

On 9/5/26 8:14 PM, Kevin Tillery via NANOG wrote:
On 4 September 2026 21:46:42 CEST, michael brooks - ESC <
michael.brooks () adams12 org> wrote:
[image: image.png]




michael brooks
Enterprise Network Architect
Adams 12 Five Star Schools
michael.brooks () adams12 org
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
"flying is learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss"



On Fri, Sep 4, 2026 at 1:36 PM Kevin Tillery via NANOG <
nanog () lists nanog org> wrote:



I'll be the contrarian here. Surely whether or not this is sane
depends on
the total price and surrounding circumstances. If a provider charges
say
$200 for a service, whether they itemize it as $200 connection, free
BGP,
free IPs; or $180 connection, $20 BGP, free IPs; or $1 connection, $9
BGP,
$190 for IPs to run BGP on; is entirely up to them and makes little
difference.
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list


https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog 
org/message/Z4AYTAM5NEPZD6G2XAFKYLIZUL6ASFG4/__;!!IR39LLzvxw!J3LIEHHUAECoamZeymzRb2jnmO1ujOb0Stgn5l2ygBYOMidrPgrRwkuypccU9Gge3H_F6nmHyLzSvrgwD2YIlRoX$


--
This is a staff email account managed by Adams 12 Five Star Schools.
This
email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the sender.

Is this really an appropriate use of NANOG?

Often when I post to NANOG, I am worried that I am being the "reply
guy", wasting the time of hundreds of network operators far above my level
with some nonsense, and I do not post things that I think will not be at
least slightly useful. And I am worried that I am not skilled in
professional English writing. But this is far below any standard I apply to
myself.

This image is now wasting most of a megabyte in how many important
people's mailboxes?

Kevin
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list

https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog 
org/message/WV6U3MV2AXI7AOMYSTMNGJPZFIZ7HUFB/__;!!IR39LLzvxw!L0Ut3zJYe-js_7c8R1WfJEcxv_OXk22QhEP6Ll4CZLACMZ46xneRbdyREHYuSBOnLZ_dNCzZmc0te5q1llhIGR1vVw$



-- 
This is a staff email account managed by Adams 12 Five Star Schools.  This 
email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. 
If you have received this email in error please notify the sender.
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog () lists nanog org/message/EHPUTEYRFASHMAH35DCEASU23DELWZPD/

Current thread: