Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Nmap Service Detection Proposal
From: "Paul Tod Rieger" <prie () abl com>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 02:49:56 -0400
Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org> wrote:
I suspect that the vast majority of protocols could be detected via a sufficiently clever probe string and regex match. Can anyone think of any protocols that could not be detected by method but could with a more powerful (think "C") syntax?
http://www.attrition.org/tools/other/binfo.c may help with 53/domain. Can 79/finger be probed with string/regex? (Or maybe finger.c would be needed?) Tod abl.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- For help using this (nmap-dev) mailing list, send a blank email to nmap-dev-help () insecure org . List run by ezmlm-idx (www.ezmlm.org).
Current thread:
- Nmap Service Detection Proposal Fyodor (Aug 27)
- RE: Nmap Service Detection Proposal Jay Freeman (saurik) (Aug 27)
- RE: Nmap Service Detection Proposal Fyodor (Aug 27)
- RE: Nmap Service Detection Proposal Jay Freeman (saurik) (Aug 27)
- RE: Nmap Service Detection Proposal Jay Freeman (saurik) (Aug 28)
- RE: Nmap Service Detection Proposal Fyodor (Aug 27)
- RE: Nmap Service Detection Proposal Jay Freeman (saurik) (Aug 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Nmap Service Detection Proposal Paul Tod Rieger (Aug 28)
- RE: Nmap Service Detection Proposal Jay Freeman (saurik) (Aug 29)
- Re: Nmap Service Detection Proposal Fyodor (Aug 29)
- Re: Nmap Service Detection Proposal H D Moore (Aug 29)
- Re: Nmap Service Detection Proposal Paul Tod Rieger (Aug 28)
- RE: Nmap Service Detection Proposal Jay Freeman (saurik) (Aug 29)
- RE: Nmap Service Detection Proposal Jay Freeman (saurik) (Aug 29)
