
Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: sig handler (was: nmap 3.70 - ultra_scan())
From: brett () custom-tech net (Brett Campbell)
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:44:37 -0700
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 10:34:21PM +0200, Nils Magnus wrote: <snip>
Being a nmap user for several years I often have similar experiences as Matt had. I'd love to see some kind of signal handler, say for SIGUSR1 that actaully terminates the current scan and moves on.
<snip>
Maybe this feature makes it at least to the wishlist?
This sounds like a great feature. Forgive me, Fyodor, if such a thing exists, as I am not familiar with the code base yet. Catching signals to do various things like this could be handy. Thanks, - -Brett --------------------------------------------------------------------- For help using this (nmap-dev) mailing list, send a blank email to nmap-dev-help () insecure org . List archive: http://seclists.org
Current thread:
- nmap 3.70 - ultra_scan() -- feature or flaw? Matt Repicky (Oct 12)
- Re: nmap 3.70 - ultra_scan() -- feature or flaw? Fyodor (Oct 12)
- Re: nmap 3.70 - ultra_scan() -- feature or flaw? Nils Magnus (Oct 12)
- Re: sig handler (was: nmap 3.70 - ultra_scan()) Brett Campbell (Oct 12)
- Re: nmap 3.70 - ultra_scan() -- feature or flaw? Nils Magnus (Oct 12)
- Re: nmap 3.70 - ultra_scan() -- feature or flaw? Fyodor (Oct 12)