
Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: All Ports filtered, no OS identify
From: dednj cjcb ekdj <netwiator () yahoo com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 11:26:32 -0800 (PST)
O.k. Thx for the answers. But it is strange that Symantec PFW gives you so much security that you even can´t break in from outside... (if you even know which pfw it is) mgrd <subscriptions () gerdau freeshell org> wrote: dednj cjcb ekdj wrote:
When I try nmap -sS -P0 192.168.1.100 , I get the response all ports are filtered. The same result with -sW , or with -O I ´ve installed on 192.168.1.100 a PFW. But how can I get any information (OS, Service Pack) out, if even do not get any answer from the machine? Is there any trick or do I have forgotten something?
nmap needs at least both one open and closed port for OS detection. -- reply to mailing list only --------------------------------------------------------------------- For help using this (nmap-dev) mailing list, send a blank email to nmap-dev-help () insecure org . List archive: http://seclists.org --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'
Current thread:
- All Ports filtered, no OS identify dednj cjcb ekdj (Jan 25)
- Re: All Ports filtered, no OS identify Ron (Jan 25)
- Re: All Ports filtered, no OS identify Martin Mačok (Jan 25)
- Re: All Ports filtered, no OS identify mgrd (Jan 25)
- Re: All Ports filtered, no OS identify dednj cjcb ekdj (Jan 25)
- Re: All Ports filtered, no OS identify Ron (Jan 25)
- Re: All Ports filtered, no OS identify dednj cjcb ekdj (Jan 25)