Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Segfault in 3.83DC1 and 3.84ALPHA1 using --excludefile option
From: Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org>
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 02:32:02 -0700
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 03:54:51PM -0300, Duilio J. Protti wrote:
In fact the problem is on skip_range() function at TargetGroup.cc:
for (i = oct; i >= 0; i--) {
if (current[i] < last[i]) {
....
the problem is that i is an unsigned int, so decrementing never reachs a
negative value, but wraparound to the biggest unsigned int value.
Good find. I have applied your patch for the next version of Nmap (due out next week). I didn't manage to get the birthday release out in time, but that is no bid deal. With all the new features, no gimmick is necessary. Thanks, Fyodor _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Current thread:
- Segfault in 3.83DC1 and 3.84ALPHA1 using --excludefile option pijn trein (Aug 31)
- Re: Segfault in 3.83DC1 and 3.84ALPHA1 using --excludefile option Aaron J. Bedra (Aug 31)
- Re: Segfault in 3.83DC1 and 3.84ALPHA1 using --excludefile option Duilio J. Protti (Aug 31)
- Re: Segfault in 3.83DC1 and 3.84ALPHA1 using --excludefile option Duilio J. Protti (Aug 31)
- Re: Segfault in 3.83DC1 and 3.84ALPHA1 using --excludefile option Fyodor (Sep 04)
- Re: Segfault in 3.83DC1 and 3.84ALPHA1 using --excludefile option Aaron J. Bedra (Aug 31)
