Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: max-scan-delay not honored?
From: Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 10:46:08 -0800
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 10:44:29AM -0800, Fyodor wrote:
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 07:38:25PM +0100, Filippo Solinas wrote:# nmap -P0 -sS -vv --packet-trace -p 0-4,80,81-85 -r --max-parallelism 1 --max-scan-delay 100 --max-retries 0 X.Y.Z.100Here you have told Nmap to send only one probe at a time (--max-scan-delay 100). So it needs to wait for each to finish before
Oops -- I meant to reference the "--max-parallelism 1" option here. Cheers, -F _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Current thread:
- max-scan-delay not honored? Filippo Solinas (Mar 10)
- Re: max-scan-delay not honored? Fyodor (Mar 10)
- Re: max-scan-delay not honored? Fyodor (Mar 10)
- Re: max-scan-delay not honored? Filippo Solinas (Mar 10)
- Re: max-scan-delay not honored? Fyodor (Mar 10)
- Re: max-scan-delay not honored? Filippo Solinas (Mar 11)
- Re: max-scan-delay not honored? Fyodor (Mar 10)
