Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Google SoC ideas
From: David Warde-Farley <david.warde.farley () utoronto ca>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 19:34:33 -0400
On 24-Apr-06, at 5:41 PM, Arthur Amarra wrote:
(sorry Adrian for accidentally sending just to you) Hi, Another of my ideas is to incorporate a "traceroute" function to Nmap, so a user will have the option of displaying the route taken before scanning a host/hosts. To get through most firewalls, something like "tcptraceroute" could be used, since some hosts block ICMP echo requests or UDP, which is used by normal traceroute. Tcptraceroute (and normal traceroute) is invaluable in my network troubleshooting toolkit, since I can traceroute to any tcp port. Would adding this to Nmap be feature bloat? Nessus already has the traceroute feature(not sure if regular or tcp- traceroute) but I like to use Nmap more;) Should these features be in another tool altogether? Any thoughts on this would be welcome.
Arthur: Another tool you might try is Layer Four Traceroute (LFT), http://pwhois.org/lft/ . It proved invaluable on one project I worked on, where tcptraceroute turned out (for some reason I can't remember at the moment) to be insufficient. I think tcptraceroute had some problems compiling on BSD at the time, as well. On one hand, it would add something to the "map" part of Nmap (since maps usually include paths taken ;) ). On the other hand, if there are good tools to do this out there in the open source world, why bother? (Maybe the existing tools /aren't/ that great, I'm not an authority in the least). To be honest, I've been racking my brain trying to think of something creative to do with Nmap or something related that hasn't been done already. Since I started grokking the -dev mailing list during last year's SoC buildup, I've watched it mature so much through the hard work of so many talented people that I keep drawing blanks for something I could reasonably implement this year. Likewise, Ncat (though I haven't yet actually /used/ it) seems to have fulfilled all the dreams that got thrown around on the nmap-soc list last year :) I actually look forward to trying out the connection brokering business - if it's what I think it is then that's really awesome. Anyway, good luck to anyone applying. I'll submit something if I can think of a project idea (or reasonably think I'm qualified to implement any of Fyodor's ideas this time around). David _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Current thread:
- Google SoC ideas Fyodor (Apr 24)
- Re: Google SoC ideas Adriano Monteiro (Apr 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Google SoC ideas Arthur Amarra (Apr 24)
- Re: Google SoC ideas David Warde-Farley (Apr 24)
- Google SoC proposal: Ntrace Arthur Amarra (May 08)
- Re: Google SoC ideas Nils Magnus (Apr 24)
- Re: Google SoC ideas Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman (Apr 24)
- Re: Google SoC ideas David Warde-Farley (Apr 24)
