Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: broken scan stats
From: Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 23:07:59 -0700
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 02:34:13AM -0700, doug () hcsw org wrote:
System DNS resolution Timing: About 0.20% done; ETC: ??:?? (??:??:?? remaining) I figure 1% is a good threshold. If we're less than 1% done we shouldn't have very good scan estimates anyways. This threshold can, of course, be changed. Also, I bundled in a tiny change to nmap_dns.cc in the patch:
Thanks, this looks great! I applied it, except I just removed the ETC estimate rather than printing '??'s for too-early estimates (I worry they might confuse people). o Fixed a bug related to bogus completion time estimates when you request an estimate (through runtime interaction) right when Nmap is starting.a subsystem (such as a port scan or version detection). Thanks to Diman Todorov for reporting the problem and Doug Hoyte for writing a fix. Cheers, -F _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Current thread:
- Re: broken scan stats doug (Jul 03)
- Re: broken scan stats Fyodor (Jul 04)
