Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Nmap Online
From: David Matousek <david () matousec com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 08:39:22 +0100
Will add some filter rules. Not dangerous but still very unpleasant. Thank you for your report. David Matousek Ron Bowes wrote:
There are some results for "-sS -O 192.168.0.0/24" -- nothing exciting, but still. David Matousek wrote:Hello, 1) Thanks for --interactive, will be added. It is not a problem even now, because such Nmap session would be killed after timeouted. But of course, it is better to add it. 2) You can not execute shell-commands (erm :) you should not be able to). 3) You can scan local network but the machine firewall will show you nothing. Maybe also a good idea to add to filter just to save a few ticks of processor time. Thanks!_______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
_______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Nmap Online David Matousek (Nov 28)
- Re: Nmap Online Hans Nilsson (Nov 28)
- Re: Nmap Online Diman Todorov (Nov 28)
- Re: Nmap Online Ron Bowes (Nov 28)
- Re: Nmap Online Hans Nilsson (Nov 29)
- Re: Nmap Online Ron Bowes (Nov 29)
- Re: Nmap Online David Matousek (Nov 29)
- Re: Nmap Online Ron Bowes (Nov 29)
- Re: Nmap Online David Matousek (Nov 30)
- Re: Nmap Online Hans Nilsson (Nov 30)
- Re: Nmap Online David Matousek (Nov 30)
- Re: Nmap Online Hans Nilsson (Nov 29)
- Re: Nmap Online Hans Nilsson (Nov 28)
