Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: [NSE] Raw sockets support
From: majek04 <nmap () forest one pl>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:26:49 +0100
Diman Todorov wrote:
I personally think that modifying nsock is preferable to introducing a thread library dependence into nmap.
In summary we can add pcap support to nsock or use some ugly and not portable hack. I also think that modifying nsock is the cleanest solution. But on the other hand nsock will depend on libpcap and libdnet which is not very good. I hope that Fyodor will accept changes to nsock as far as they are clean and elegant enough. If we're going to support raw sockets in NSE we'll need some extra information about target. - whether the target is in our LAN, it's mac address - outgoing interface Diman, can you think about it? MM. _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- [NSE] Raw sockets support majek04 (Dec 11)
- Re: [NSE] Raw sockets support castorpilot (Dec 11)
- Re: [NSE] Raw sockets support Diman Todorov (Dec 11)
- Re: [NSE] Raw sockets support majek04 (Dec 12)
- Re: [NSE] Raw sockets support majek04 (Dec 15)
- Re: [NSE] Raw sockets support Fyodor (Dec 15)
- Re: [NSE] Raw sockets support Diman Todorov (Dec 11)
- Re: [NSE] Raw sockets support castorpilot (Dec 11)
