Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Nmap question (timeout versus scan-delay)
From: "John P. Wilson" <jpw () creare com>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 11:08:02 -0400
Martin, Sorry for the separate posting to this list; I wasn't subscribed to the list when I made the first post. Thank you for your explanation. I think I follow, but to make sure I understand: timeout is the amount of time to wait for a response scan-delay is the amount of time to wait between consecutive probes - these can either be repeated probes to the same port or when moving from one port to another port. If scan-delay is zero (which I assume it is by default) then I suppose multiple probes can be sent to multiple ports at once, right (parallel probing)? If scan-delay is greater than zero then, as you point out, this enforces serialization - only dealing with one probe at a time. Is there ever a case where multiple probes are sent all at once to one port? If no reply is received and timeout expires, and if there are still retries to perform, is the probe sent out immediately, regardless of what scan-delay is set to? Also: must scan-delay be greater than timeout? Many thanks for any additional information you can provide, John P. Wilson Creare Inc. P.O. Box 71 Hanover, NH 03755 603-640-2474 Fax 603-643-4657 _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Re: Nmap question (timeout versus scan-delay) John P. Wilson (Oct 05)
- Re: Nmap question (timeout versus scan-delay) Martin Mačok (Oct 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Nmap question (timeout versus scan-delay) John P. Wilson (Oct 05)
