Re: [tyler.ritchie () gmail com: Fwd: [gaveens () gmail com: Re: About NSE script license field]]

["Kris Katterjohn" <katterjohn () gmail com>]

On 9/6/07, Benson Kalahar <bensonk () acm wwu edu> wrote:
> So, I sent the original query to my friend whose dad is a lawyer.  Here
> is their conversation regarding referring to the licenses of other
> pieces of software.
>
> Benson
>
> ----- Forwarded message from Tyler <tyler.ritchie () gmail com> -----
>
> Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:44:32 -0700
> From: Tyler <tyler.ritchie () gmail com>
> To: Benson Kalahar <bensonk () acm wwu edu>
> Subject: Fwd: [gaveens () gmail com: Re: About NSE script license field]
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Craig Ritchie <rslaw () olympus net>
> Date: Sep 5, 2007 5:26 PM
> Subject: RE: [gaveens () gmail com: Re: About NSE script license field]
> To: Tyler <tyler.ritchie () gmail com>
>
> So, I don't think it's a problem just referring to another license and
> adopting its terms by reference as long as the other contract is clearly
> referenced and easy to find and read.
>
> Dad
Cool, thanks!

If Fyodor gives it an OK, then I'll change mine over to it (and hopefully
the other guys will do the same for consistency).  If Fyodor is iffy about
it, then I don't want to change it.

Thanks again,
Kris Katterjohn

_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org