Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: [PATCH] IP Protocol Ping
From: "Kris Katterjohn" <katterjohn () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 20:24:51 -0500
On 10/28/07, Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 05:53:18PM -0500, Kris Katterjohn wrote:Currently the default is to send with protocols numbers 1 (ICMP), 2 (IGMP), 6 (TCP), and 17 (UDP).Since Nmap already has extensive techniques for sending TCP and UDP ping packets, maybe the -PO defaults should just be 1 and 2 (maybe a couple others if you think they're worth it). What do you think, Kris? Cheers, -F
That sounds OK to me. Using 4 (IP-in-IP tunnel) may be a good additional one to add as this has a better likelihood to get through than other uncommon protocols. I'll change this. Thanks, Kris Katterjohn _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- [PATCH] IP Protocol Ping Kris Katterjohn (Oct 24)
- Re: [PATCH] IP Protocol Ping Fyodor (Oct 27)
- Re: [PATCH] IP Protocol Ping Kris Katterjohn (Oct 27)
- Re: [PATCH] IP Protocol Ping Fyodor (Oct 28)
- Re: [PATCH] IP Protocol Ping Kris Katterjohn (Oct 28)
- Re: [PATCH] IP Protocol Ping Fyodor (Oct 27)
