Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Latest Nmap = Segmentation fault
From: Lionel Cons <lionel.cons () cern ch>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 12:11:20 +0100
Diman Todorov writes:
okay, I seem to have misjudged your problem. I committed a fix to the svn repository.
It works fine. I don't get the segfault anymore. Thanks.
But just on a side note, what are you trying to accomplish?
I'm trying to detect RMCP (Remote Management and Control Protocol) support. As this may come from some hardware (BMC = Baseboard Management Controller) and from not the operating system, the port may appear to be closed. Here are real life traces: Nmap tests the port: 11:51:04.839450 IP scanner.63476 > target.623: UDP, length 0 The OS replies that nothing runs there: 11:51:04.851190 IP target > scanner: icmp 36: target udp port 623 unreachable The NSE script sends a well crafter packet: 11:51:04.860910 IP scanner.41480 > target.623: UDP, length 12 The OS replies that nothing runs there: 11:51:04.872635 IP target > scanner: icmp 48: target udp port 623 unreachable But the hardware replies: 11:51:04.887943 IP target.623 > scanner.41480: UDP, length 28 So Nmap really thinks that the port is closed, so it seems I cannot use a port rule. Cheers, Lionel _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Latest Nmap = Segmentation fault Lionel Cons (Dec 04)
- Re: Latest Nmap = Segmentation fault Diman Todorov (Dec 04)
- Re: Latest Nmap = Segmentation fault Lionel Cons (Dec 04)
- Re: Latest Nmap = Segmentation fault Diman Todorov (Dec 04)
- Re: Latest Nmap = Segmentation fault Lionel Cons (Dec 04)
- Re: Latest Nmap = Segmentation fault Diman Todorov (Dec 04)
- Re: Latest Nmap = Segmentation fault Lionel Cons (Dec 04)
- Re: Latest Nmap = Segmentation fault Lionel Cons (Dec 04)
- Re: Latest Nmap = Segmentation fault Diman Todorov (Dec 04)
